Thursday, December 22, 2011

The importance of Hashtags

So why are hashtags so important when posting something online?

From Wikipedia; what a Hashtag is:

Hashtags are words or phrases prefixed with the symbol #, a form of metadata tag. Short messages on microblogging social networking services such as Twitter, identi.ca or Google+ may be tagged by including one or more with multiple words concatenated, such as those in:
#Wikipedia is my favourite kind of #encyclopedia
Then, a person can search for the string #Wikipedia and this tagged word will appear in the search engine results. Such tags are case-insensitive.
Wikipedia

Basically it makes it easier for anyone online to find posts related to what they want to see/read about. And it's something I haven't thought much about until now. When Google+ first started out and everyone shared and commented on everyone else's posts the stream didn't seem so "full", and getting attention wasn't really a problem. However, now that G+ is open to everyone and the best photographers have over 100 000 followers and people are posting all over the place, getting noticed is actually getting harder and harder.

I haven't been all too active lately because of my health, but I have noticed that my posts weren't really getting any attention. Not like they used to a while ago anyways. But then I remembered hashtags. I've been seeing posts about it here and there (and being on Twitter have made me quite used to how it works), but I haven't been any good at keeping my posts updated with hashtags.

So after today's urban exploration I was going to publish a photograph (below) and thought to myself "I have to remember hashtags THIS time!", and I added a few (#urban #exploration #decay #ruin etc).




Then: WHAM! the +1's and comments started raining in almost immediately!

Of course, it must be said that the published work needs to have quality too, otherwise all the hashtags in the world won't make you noticable, but you catch my drift.

So for my conclusion: Remember hashtags so you don't drown in the endless stream of information that just rushes by!

Monday, December 5, 2011

Being a Photographer and dealing with Bad Health.


You might ask yourself why I would choose to be a nature photographer when all odds are against me in such a line of work. I have had severe asthma and allergies (food, pollen etc) since I was born. I also have hip dysplasia and PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder). Combined this results in quite the cocktail of health problems, and the actual reach I have of going anywhere is short (and random) at best.

It should be mentioned that I have some wonderful members in my family, and friends, and a boyfriend, who help me a great deal with all of these challenges. My mother was so wonderful to take me on a trip to Iceland this autumn. Paid for and arranged everything so I could just tag along and see the sights and take photos. (With being sick all the time I haven't had the chance to have an actual job, so my income is extremely limited). That is to say; photography is a job and a career, but it's one I can't pursue at more than a randomly part time sort of level. I can't live off of it.

In addition to my mom, my boyfriend is usually both my driver and my sherpa ;) I don't know what I'd do without him :) My sister is also wonderful, and buys a lot of my photos to have in her home. It's cool to see all my art on her walls. And last but not least there's also Gøran, my step dad, who keeps letting me "inherit" some of his camera equipment when he buys something new, and buys me the most amazing birthday gifts (which I never expect). This year I got a Sigma 10-20mm 1:4-5.6 :D




But just this year I've had the flue, a severe cold (after my trip to Iceland), I got way more sick than expected after taking the seasonal flue-shot, and then finally pneumonia that had to be taken care of by antibiotics. And all within a 4 month period. With all that ravaging my body, it's pretty hard to do anything except sitting in front of the tv being a vegetable and taking triple of the usual medications (doc's orders) :P

Getting back to the point though. It might not seem like a logical choice to become a professional nature photographer of all things with this going on (and considering professional means a person who is paid to undertake a specialised set of tasks and to complete them for a fee, I think of myself as a professional photographer, even though my rates of sale are still low). But after a lifetime of trying to figure out who I am and what I love (I tried painting, drawing, sculpting etc) photography was where I found my calling and fell in love.

And like most other things you can't choose what you love. It's just something you discover and that makes your heart sing, and takes you away from all the other crap that exists in life.

It often depresses me how little I actually get to do on any given day/week to pursue this love of mine, but the reality is what it is, and there's not really anything I can do about it. At least not yet.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that when you find something you really love, you'll do what it takes to stick with it. Even though abilities, economy and situations might be limited it's always better to do something wonderful a little bit every now and then, than not at all. And it can give an otherwise meaningless existence meaning and purpose.

And as you can see in the photo I posted at the top of this blog post, even parent's backyards can hold exciting and wonderful things to capture :)

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Reasons Why Professional Photographers Cannot Work for Free.

This is from the original blogpost, here: http://photoprofessionals.wordpress.com/ written by Tony Wu. It's worth reading, and points out very nicely why Professional Photographers can't work for free.




..and just to note something about what this text says about risks; I chose to add a photograph I took two years ago, on a little hike where I suddenly found myself standing on the edge of an ice sheet and not quite sure how I was going to get back to land. It worked out obviously, but still. There is more to nature photography than walking on trails and taking quick snapshots. In order to capture what we see, we sometimes fall into rivers, climb steep hills, fall down slopes etc etc.. the legwork behind these photos is usually quite extensive. And even though I do this of my own free will and with a glad heart, it's not something I do just to give it all away for free later.


As professional photographers, we receive requests for free images on a regular basis. In a perfect world, each of us would love to be able to respond in a positive manner and assist, especially with projects or efforts related to areas such as education, social issues, and conservation of natural resources. It is fair to say that in many cases, we wish we had the time and resources to do more to assist than just send photographs.

Unfortunately, such are the practicalities of life that we are often unable to respond, or that when we do, our replies are brief and do not convey an adequate sense of the reasons underlying our response.

Circumstances vary for each situation, but we have found that there are a number of recurring themes, which we have set out below with the objective of communicating more clearly with you, and hopefully avoiding misunderstandings or unintentionally engendering ill will.

Please take the following points in the constructive manner in which they are intended. We certainly hope that after you have had a chance to read this, we will be able to talk again and establish a mutually beneficial working relationship.

Photographs Are Our Livelihood

Creating compelling images is the way we make our living. If we give away our images for free, or spend too much time responding to requests for free images, we cannot make a living.

We Do Support Worthy Causes With Images

Most of us do contribute photographs, sometimes more, to support certain causes. In many cases, we may have participated directly in projects that we support with images, or we may have a pre-existing personal relationship with key people involved with the efforts concerned. In other words, each of us can and does provide images without compensation on a selective basis.

We Have Time Constraints

Making a leap from such selective support to responding positively to every request we get for free photographs, however, is impractical, if for no other reason than the substantial amount of time required to respond to requests, exchange correspondence, prepare and send files, and then follow-up to find out how our images were used and what objectives, if any, were achieved. It takes a lot of time to respond to requests, and time is always in short supply.

Pleas of “We Have No Money” Are Often Difficult to Fathom
The primary rationale provided in nearly all requests for free photographs is budgetary constraint, meaning that the requestor pleads a lack of funds.

Such requests frequently originate from organisations with a lot of cash on hand, whether they be publicly listed companies, government or quasi-government agencies, or even NGOs. Often, it is a simple matter of taking a look at a public filing or other similar disclosure document to see that the entity concerned has access to significant funding, certainly more than enough to pay photographers a reasonable fee should they choose to do so.

To make matters worse, it is apparent that all too often, of all the parties involved in a project or particular effort, photographers are the only ones being asked to work for free. Everyone else gets paid.

Given considerations like this, you can perhaps understand why we frequently feel slighted when we are told that: “We have no money.” Such claims can come across as a cynical ploy intended to take advantage of gullible individuals.

We Have Real Budget Constraints

With some exceptions, photography is not a highly remunerative profession. We have chosen this path in large part due to the passion we have for visual communication, visual art, and the subject matters in which we specialise.

The substantial increase in photographs available via the internet in recent years, coupled with reduced budgets of many photo buyers, means that our already meager incomes have come under additional strain.

Moreover, being a professional photographer involves significant monetary investment.

Our profession is by nature equipment-intensive. We need to buy cameras, lenses, computers, software, storage devices, and more on a regular basis. Things break and need to be repaired. We need back-ups of all our data, as one ill-placed cup of coffee could literally erase years of work. For all of us, investment in essential hardware and software entails thousands of dollars a year, as we need to stay current with new technology and best practices.

In addition, travel is a big part of many of our businesses. We must spend a lot of money on transportation, lodging and other travel-related costs.

And of course, perhaps most importantly, there is a substantial sum associated with the time and experience we have invested to become proficient at what we do, as well as the personal risks we often take. Taking snapshots may only involve pressing the camera shutter release, but creating images requires skill, experience and judgement.

So the bottom line is that although we certainly understand and can sympathise with budget constraints, from a practical point of view, we simply cannot afford to subsidise everyone who asks.

Getting “Credit” Doesn’t Mean Much

Part and parcel with requests for free images premised on budgetary constraints is often the promise of providing “credit” and “exposure”, in the form or a watermark, link, or perhaps even a specific mention, as a form of compensation in lieu of commercial remuneration.

There are two major problems with this.

First, getting credit isn’t compensation. We did, after all, create the images concerned, so credit is automatic. It is not something that we hope a third party will be kind enough to grant us.

Second, credit doesn’t pay bills. As we hopefully made clear above, we work hard to make the money required to reinvest in our photographic equipment and to cover related business expenses. On top of that, we need to make enough to pay for basic necessities like food, housing, transportation, etc.

In short, receiving credit for an image we created is a given, not compensation, and credit is not a substitute for payment.

“You Are The Only Photographer Being Unreasonable”

When we do have time to engage in correspondence with people and entities who request free photos, the dialogue sometimes degenerates into an agitated statement directed toward us, asserting in essence that all other photographers the person or entity has contacted are more than delighted to provide photos for free, and that somehow, we are “the only photographer being unreasonable”.

We know that is not true.

We also know that no reasonable and competent photographer would agree to unreasonable conditions. We do allow for the fact that some inexperienced photographers or people who happen to own cameras may indeed agree to work for free, but as the folk wisdom goes: “You get what you pay for.”

Please Follow-Up

One other experience we have in common is that when we do provide photographs for free, we often do not receive updates, feedback or any other form of follow-up letting us know how the event or project unfolded, what goals (if any) were achieved, and what good (if any) our photos did.

All too often, we don’t even get responses to emails we send to follow-up, until, of course, the next time that someone wants free photographs.

In instances where we do agree to work for free, please have the courtesy to follow-up and let us know how things went. A little consideration will go a long way in making us feel more inclined to take time to provide additional images in the future.

Wrap Up

We hope that the above points help elucidate why the relevant photographer listed below has sent you to this link. All of us are dedicated professionals, and we would be happy to work with you to move forward in a mutually beneficial manner.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Iceland. Photos and thoughts.

I am very happy about all the wonderful words and +1's I've gotten on my series of photos from Iceland. At the same time I feel that most of them are below the level I would want them to be. Mind you I'm not fishing for compliments, I just have to air a thought or two.



At the trip we had so little time at each location seeing as we were on a guided tour. It was very rewarding and educational, and I'm really satisfied about the whole experience. But at the same time I wish we could have had more time. I never really had any time to think about camera settings, angles, dust removal, light etc.. I only had time for running around taking "snapshots". Which yielded some very nice (albeit few) photos still, but most of my total amount of photos are utterly useless or just "tourist-level" photos, with only one or two exceptions here and there.



At least now I have a good excuse to go back ;) but next time I'm going to rent an Arctic Truck and have at least a week, so I can have time to do everything right :) I just have to win the lottery or something first x)



Btw: click the images for larger views.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Stepping out from the Shadows..

This is a post I've been thinking about writing ever since I started getting "followers" on Google+. (It's wrong to call people followers since we're all just adding each other in circles, but "circlers" just sound wrong in my head somehow.) And now that I'm having yet another night of rampant insomnia, it's a good a time as any to start writing.

Anyways.. This one is going to be rather personal (although still relating to photography), so it's time to jump ship now if you're more interested in reading about photography tips than me as a person ;)


What this is going to all boil down to is in the title. After I started selling some photos, moving "up" in the world of photography, and actually making a little bit of a name for myself via the wonderful invention of Google+ there have been several things that are very new to me.

First off I'd like to say that I'm struggeling with PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) and that in most of my life I've made it a skill to hide in the shadows so to speak. Ironically you wouldn't be able to guess that if you met me in real life (I have black dreadlocks and look like the run of the mill metal-head, and we tend to stick out in a crowd). But on a personal level I've been very wary of attatchments, and online I've been extremely cautious (and for some very good reasons that I won't get into here). I've always been very aware of privacy-regulations on Facebook and such sites, and not allowing any apps that can track me, or share my address / phone number and so forth. Like mentioned before; hiding in the shadows. And I've liked it that way.

But in the pursuit of becoming a known, professional photographer the style of hiding in the shadows just isn't compatible with the desired goal. I have made myself take a step into the visible world, even though it's mostly on the internet for now. This has been extremely scary for me, but also very rewarding. The amount of positive feedback, the nice words people write and just the sheer welcoming gestures I've recieved have been fantastic. The attention is, to be honest, a little overwhelming. And I always feel like I don't really deserve all the attention anyway..

The paradox is that on one side it's helping me step out of my comfort zone and makes me participate in a world I usually used to just observe from the outside, but at the same time it's also spiking my PTSD. All the attention (albeit wonderful comments, encouragement and acknowledgement) is making me feel very exposed. And even though I know (on a rational level) that it's something I'll just have to "get used to" (I tried to think of a way of saying that without making it sound arrogant, but it was impossible) I can't seem to shake how nervous it makes me. Hence writing this now, at 04:05 AM.

For those of you who (are still reading this) and might not be familiar with PTSD it all depends very much on what kind of trauma the individual has experienced in order to develop the disorder, but the end result is usually the same. And to quote Wikipedia:
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a severe anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to any event that results in psychological trauma. Symptoms for PTSD include re-experiencing the original trauma(s) through flashbacks or nightmares, avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, and increased arousal – such as difficulty falling or staying asleep, anger, and hypervigilance. Hypervigilance is an enhanced state of sensory sensitivity accompanied by an exaggerated intensity of behaviors whose purpose is to detect threats. Hypervigilance is also accompanied by a state of increased anxiety which can cause exhaustion.

Basically the fight or flight response is always active, and it can be extremely exhausting.

But getting back on track, this is something I know I have to work with. And like with everything else it's imporant to know one's limits. At the same time it's important to push the limits. I guess that's why I decided to "take the plunge" and put myself more out there. And the invention of Google+ became a way for me to do that, without pushing too hard. Although when I'm having sleepless nights like this it does make me wonder if I have the courage to see it through. My first instinct is still to go into hiding again. To step back into the shadows where it's safe.

That's where love comes into the picture I guess. I love photography. Deeply. For me, it's not so much about the craft itself, or art or any fancy ideas of conveying some sort of message. It's all about trying to capture the beauty I find, wherever I find it. No doubt that my personal experiences have influenced my view of the world, and made me as cynical as I now am. But the camera is my gateway into the better parts of what is out there. It lets me see something that can make it all worth while. It let's me be creative, in my own way. And it always feels a bit safer to venture outside when you can hide behind a big DSLR ;)

And now, I don't really know if there is anything more to say about the subject. I just felt I had to write all this down. I would just like to point out that, even though being out there on the internet might not seem like such a big thing, to me it is. For me it has been a huge step, and one I'm still just inching into. One toe at a time. But who knows, maybe some day it won't be so scary and I'll have a go at the real world too?

Monday, October 17, 2011

Google+: The Survival Guide for a Photographer’s Paradise v2.1 - by Colby Brown

NOTE: All this text is originally written by Colby Brown, and can be read in his blog (linked below). You should definately check out his blogpost about how to use G+.

http://www.colbybrownphotography.com/blog/google-the-survival-guide-for-a-photographers-paradise

I think there is no arguing, Google+ is the most engaging and interactive social network for photographers today. Many of us photo geeks have been waiting patiently for something like this to come along. After all the excitement about Google Buzz and Google Wave, both of which have turned out to be flops, we were let down. Forced to use Twitter and Facebook or Flickr and 500px, we had to make do with what was available. I know I am not alone when I say that while those networks have certainly been beneficial to my photography business, they were not easy to grow or interact with people in meaningful ways.

You see, for the most part, there are three types of individuals out there in the photography world:

Content Creators: Those that run a business and need avenues in order to create/share original content, photography work, ideas and services.

Inspiration Seekers:
Those that are interested in photography and are just looking for inspiration.

Everyone Else:
The vast majority of people that are somewhere in-between.

Each of these three types of “photographers” are looking for different things when it comes to which social network works for them. In the past, each group had to use a mix of all of the major networks and image sharing websites in order to fulfill their needs. That was then. This is now.

Google+…What is it?

Google + is unlike anything else out there on the market. It is an information/media streaming powerhouse. It is a system that thrives on the idea of interaction. It is a social network that takes what we know of social networks and throws it out the window. It is what what most of us have been waiting for.

The life blood of Google+ is the stream of information that flows through its system and shows up on your computer screen before you even knew it existed. When you first sign up, things look daunting. Nothing seems to be showing up in your stream and you might even be a little confused…I know I was. But unlike Twitter (which feels like you are trying to whisper during a music concert to get attention) or Facebook (where it feels like you have to fight your way into private clubs or try to create your own), Google+ forces you to expand your horizons and jump into the pool head first. At first you might connect with just a few of your friends, but through those connections you will meet more and more individuals that share your passions. As you continue to get entangled in the networking spiderweb of interactions and information, Google+ truly begins to reveal its potential. It isn’t built on the principle of a two way street, but rather a superhighway, where for once you get to direct the traffic.

Google+ appears to be rewriting the rules when it comes to social media. You can’t treat it like Twitter, Facebook, Flickr or 500px. While there is a learning curve at first, it is built on the simple idea of three core concepts.

Search
Social Interaction
Control

Google+ got its name because Google wanted it to become an extension of Google itself, whose foundation is based on searching for information. Over the years Google has worked hard to give you nearly all the tools to run both your online and real lives, from Gmail to Gchat, Calendar to Reader, Picasa to Google Docs. With G+, Google intends to bring all of the core features that most of us use everyday under one massive umbrella.




For more information, visit Colby Brown's blog here: http://www.colbybrownphotography.com/blog/google-the-survival-guide-for-a-photographers-paradise

Thursday, October 13, 2011

A follow up..

It's fun to be on Google+ these days. A lot of fun actually. And I thought I'd make this blogpost as kind of a follow up to the one before about Unconventional Compositions and such..


After all the negativity I've got on deviantArt for this photo, and things that I talked about in the previous post, it's nice to get some positive feedback at last :) This really made my day to be honest. Out of all my 78 photos in the portfolio-folder on G+ he decided to say something really nice about this one. What else is there to say except: ♥

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Unconventional Compositions and artistic douchebags

I've been thinking a little bit about this recently, and it all kind of centres around this photo.



I've gotten quite a few negative remarks about this photo since I first published it in 2007. Mostly concerning the composition. There seems to be a lot of people who think the cropping is all wrong and that the image lacks balance, and that I should have followed the "rules". But ironically, when I tell them I've "broken the rules on purpose" they suddenly become very impressed and like the image after all.

First of all, I seldom (if ever) think very much about composition etc when I'm in the field. I usually just see what works and what doesn't. And I'm not afraid to experiment either, so I usually just play around with what I come across and see what comes of it later. And that's the way I like to do things. Getting back to the photo above, I had the same approach there. I tried a lot of different angles, depths etc. But this is the one I settled on when I decided to publish.

Why? Because it looks right to me. And when you think about it, it can be analysed without falling apart too xP
The flower moves diagonally through the image, giving it life and movement even though it's in black and white. The blurry background gives the flower main focus, but at the same time it brings forward the negative spaces in the photo, and it anchors the movement to the left side. Also the background divide the photo in a way that you can clearly see the rule of thirds. The flower doesn't just "fall out" of the photo, because of the background.

And I don't know about you guys, but I tend to think about these things quite a bit when I do the post processing of my photos, even if I don't do it in the field. And it bothers me when people try to pick apart my art at first and then suddenly change their mind just because I was able to show them I actually *did* think about such things before I published.. The photo doesn't magically become better just because the person who took it demonstrates the ability to think once or twice.

Either you like something or you don't. At least have the balls to stand by your opinions. Don't be an artistic douchebag (which is just a regular douchbag trying to hide behind fancy words and arm flailing).

Monday, October 10, 2011

Photographic taboos.

Below is a photo and a quote from a blog by J.H. Andersen. It is very well written and deserves a read. His thoughts on this subject are some that I agree wholeheartedly with.





"To me there are no taboos in photography. I respect that some people don’t want to look at my images, so be it. But I will never allow it to limit me. I want photos with impact – real or staged, studio or street, color or monochrome. Bring it on."

http://www.jhandersen.com/197/photographic-taboos/

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Monday, September 26, 2011

Considering Critique


I’ve been thinking about critique, and the difficulty of knowing how/when to give it, and also how I react personally to criticism.

The mainstream idea is that constructive criticism is a good way to learn. This has always puzzled me a little. Yes, it’s good if you can give others advice about how they can do things differently or just bring your own personal perspective into the mix, but when is it okay to do so? It’s obviously fine if someone requests it. But is it okay otherwise?


Some people looove giving advice and critiquing others, at any given moment, whilst others are more apprehensive. Some people thrive when being critiqued and they develop their skills much more efficiently as a result. Others take it as a personal insult and completely lose their flare and creativity because of it. And when it comes to art this is like trying to navigate in a minefield (at least that’s how I’ve come to see it).

Personally I try to avoid critiquing other people’s art unless they ask for an honest opinion. And when I say this it’s important to note that I’m always honest. If I like something I say it, and I mean it. I like to elaborate on why I like it, and I’m not hesitant to make a big deal out of how much I may love something. But if I don’t like something, or think it’s just fine (but some aspect could have been done a lot differently) I tend to keep it to myself. I don’t like the “lecturing someone else on how to do art”.


Mainly this has to do with my own flaw when it comes to criticism. I am well aware of that I can’t really handle criticism at all. I get defensive, wounded and at times even hostile when/if people try to tell me “how to do it right”, and I discard any pointers/ideas completely (no matter how good or valid they may be). This is because I consider my creative process to be a very personal and private thing. I am well aware of that I have a whole lot left to learn, and that many of my photos could have been done very differently, both in the field and in the later, editing stages. But at the time of creating said photograph it’s the best I can do, and it’s the way I see things around me. It’s a perception I have that in time probably will change as I learn and see even more. And for someone else to come along and hack away at it (even if it’s done with the very best of intentions) is something that often hurts me very deeply. And hence I try to avoid doing it to others if they happen to feel the same as me when it comes to criticism.

I don’t know if anyone else is like this too, but just the possibility of others reacting like I do makes me think that we should all be a little careful of how we give “advice” to other artists. We should also be mindful of that everyone sees things differently, and what may be breathtakingly beautiful to me might not be the same for you, or anyone else for that matter. And thus there can’t really be any clear definitions of right or wrong ways of making art. Just different ideas and perspectives.


It’s worth keeping in mind the next time you see / hear something and think “dear lord that’s crap” ;)